Want to explore your next brand move? Book a call with OtherFolk® and let’s talk.
It is easy to fall into the trap of using brand testing as a vote, hoping the “right” direction will reveal itself through customer opinion. But testing cannot replace strategy. Its real value is in de-risking potentially polarising moves, or checking whether a clear brand direction is landing as intended. Here we'll look at how to use customer testing well, when not to use it, and the mistakes to avoid.
You don’t need a hundred voices. Five well-chosen customers will surface most of what you need. Beyond that, feedback becomes repetitive and muddy. And if you are presenting a dozen options, you haven’t made the hard calls. Research is not a shortcut to clarity. Customers should only ever be asked to react to one or two clear, fully-formed directions - not to choose between half-baked ideas or endless variations.
Colours, fonts and trends should be guided by market understanding. Your job - and your agency’s - is to see where competitors cluster and then carve out space to stand apart. Customers cannot do that work for you. Research should test complete, strategic directions, not fragments of branding or a pile of colour options.
When research starts to look like a popularity contest, you are heading for generic work. Use it to sharpen, never to hand over decision-making. Ten near-identical concepts being run past customers is not testing, it is abdication. Put forward one or two directions shaped by strategy, and only test if there is a real risk of strong push-back.
Customers can tell you if you’ve missed the mark, but they cannot define your strategy. They may also push you toward what feels familiar, and homogeny is the last thing a brand needs.
Strategy sets the direction: who you are, why you exist, what you stand for. Customers can tell you if you’ve missed the mark, but they cannot define your strategy. They may also push you toward what feels familiar, and homogeny is the last thing a brand needs. What you want from customer feedback is strong qualitative push-back, not consensus.
Customer research has value when there is genuine risk. A sense-check can tell you how a bold move lands, but only if you are clear on what you are testing. Removing a distinctive asset? Taking a 180 degree turn? Worried that one colour choice could jar in the market? These are moments to test.
What you should avoid is testing as a default step, or putting twenty colour options in front of people and asking them to pick. That is not research. It is a vote, and it tells you nothing about sentiment toward your brand direction. Testing should focus on one or two complete ideas - and only if there is a real chance of strong push-back.
Testing a brand is not the same as testing a product. A website or an app has a clear job: either the path works or it doesn’t. That is why early testing makes sense in digital. Brand is different. You cannot measure it with the same binary clarity. Testing half-baked ideas only gives you emotional reactions to unfinished aesthetics - and risks killing a strong direction before it has matured. Have conviction. Develop the brand to a point where it can be tested properly, and only then bring in customers if there is genuine risk.
Tickbox surveys that tell you which option people favour rarely help. What matters is why. Branding is emotional. Even when people think they’re being rational, their feelings are leading the decision. Insight comes from patterns in qualitative feedback: “this feels trustworthy,” “this feels confusing,” “this is the worst thing I’ve ever seen". That is the material you can work with. “I like this one best” is not.
And again - keep it focused. Test one or two complete directions, not vague fragments or a mass of styles, and use qualitative feedback to understand how it lands.
Branding should always be led by the why, what and who of your business. Market research is always needed - it gives you the foundation by showing you where you sit against competitors, how stakeholders see you, and how customers already talk about you in the wild. Customer testing is different. It is optional, and should only be used when strategy is set and when there is real risk involved.
If your brand strategy is clear and you are not making a risky move, customer testing adds very little. What matters is conviction and clarity, supported by a strong strategy and grounded in market research. Customer testing should never replace that work - it is there only to sharpen and de-risk. The strongest brands know when to test, when to listen, and when to trust the strategy that led them there.
Want to explore your next brand move? Book a call with OtherFolk® and let’s talk.
How we put the whole team on the same page before brand development begins.
Great branding can only be built on strategic clarity: knowing why you exist, who you are for, and how you want to show up. That clarity cannot be handed down from the top or left to find it's own way – it has to be built top-down, with intention. Brand sprint workshops create a space where all stakeholders are present, and the big questions get answered in real time. Often for the first time, people hear each other’s perspectives – friction can often be part of the process – debate hard truths, and resolve the differences that would otherwise resurface later. Clarity and team alignment is key, and for that reason it's how we start all our branding work at Otherfolk®.
When you're appointing stakeholders, be clear on exactly why they're there beyond an additional opinion, and what unique view they bring to the table.
Your agency/studio, and key decision-makers: founders, senior leadership, marketing leads, and anyone else with a stake in the brand. If someone is missing, decisions made in the sprint risk being undone once they weigh in. That said, it's important to keep the stakeholder group small – like any project, too many voices risk pulling the project apart, and creating more noise than neccesary. So when you're appointing stakeholders, be clear on exactly why they're there beyond an additional opinion, and what unique view they bring to the table. Attendance is non-negotiable for this group – it only works if the people who will see the project through is present to avoid suprises later on. Also: no devices, no distractions.
The workshop runs through a series of structured exercises over the course of approximately three hours (with breaks). Each exercise exists for a reason:
1. The Five-Year Roadmap: This forces the team to think beyond today’s targets. Where does the brand need to be in two, three, or five years? What needs to be true in order for those targets to be met? Is it the same brand, products, or something different? This exercise sets ambition and ensures the brand is built with the future in mind, not just the present quarter.
2. Why / What / How: Starting with why you exist as a business defines the brand’s reason to exist beyond revenue. What problem are you here to solve for your customers? What impact do you want to have? What do you offer? How is that delivered? Are these clear and differential?
3. Values: Every brand claims to have values. A brand sprint cuts the list down to the three that genuinely guide behaviour. This makes them usable in practice, rather than wallpaper.
4. Audiences: You can't be everything to everyone. This exercise forces prioritisation. Who are the three groups that matter most? Decisions get sharper when you are clear who you are talking to.
5. Personality: Is the brand playful or serious? Modern or classic? Bold or understated? These simple scales spark debate and create agreement on tone and style.
6. Competitive Landscape: By mapping competitors, you see not just who you are up against but also where the gaps are. It is a visual way to decide where your brand should sit, and where it shouldn't.
Each exercise pushes the team to make choices, often tough ones. The point is not to avoid disagreement but to use it productively.
A brand sprint is three hours of focus that can save three months of drift. It gives you clarity, direction, and alignment, and it does it in a way that energises teams rather than drains them. The outcome is a clear foundation for brand, design, and content that everyone has a hand in shaping. If you're kicking off brand work, there is no better way to start.
Understanding the pre-work and post-launch support needed when branding.
Before you dive in to creating a new brand identity, it’s worth pausing to think about what really needs to be in place for the work to succeed. A rebrand is one of the biggest investments a marketing leader will make, and the pitfalls are rarely in the creative output itself. More often, the problems come afterwards – when organisations aren’t ready to manage what’s been created. Here are some considerations before you begin.
Who will steward the brand day to day? Not at a strategic level, but in the detail. Making sure when new icons are introduced, their weights and proportions match; that photo treatments stay consistent; that “almost right” colours don’t creep into decks. Each of those things might feel close enough, but line them up against the brand you paid for and the drift is obvious. And the impact is rarely instant – it’s two years of small shifts that erode value. Brands should always evolve, and guidelines should be exactly that – guidelines – but making sure the integrity of the brand you've created remains in-tact is a full-time team job.
Brands should always evolve, and guidelines should be exactly that – guidelines – but protecting the integrity of the system is a full-time job.
As much as you may want to have an identity that rivals your favourite brand, making sure what’s created is realistic for the team you have in place is paramount. If your internal team is small, the identity needs to be simple to manage, with assets and templates that can be applied quickly without heavy oversight. If the approach is too complex, it will quickly break down in practice. Be realistic and clear from the outset about how asset creation and updates will actually be handled, and approach the brand system accordingly.
Beyond the work, is your chosen agency or studio people you can have the right conversations with? Branding involves decisions that are rarely black and white, and so clarity often comes from pushing through difficult discussions. The right fit isn’t about portfolio alone – it’s about whether you trust them to be in the room with you for those conversations.
Finally, be clear on scope. A rebrand is never just a website refresh. It reaches into email signatures, white papers, editorial grids, social templates, presentations, signage, even the way fonts are distributed internally. Each of those touchpoints has implications for time and resources. If you don’t map the full scope upfront, you risk discovering gaps mid-rollout when momentum has already slowed. Think about this upfront, and save yourself the headache later on.
A rebrand lives or dies in how it is carried forward. The creative process produces the system, but it’s ownership, governance, team capacity, agency fit, and a clear view of scope that decide whether it stays intact in the years that follow. Put those things in place, and the work you invested in has the best chance of holding together and delivering value long after launch.